It would pay them with fair wages and care for their rights. Pharmacare should pay the indigenous people with fair wages for the back-breaking work they do. Pharmacare has also started its own initiatives focused on the protection of the environment.
Any person would find it unethical as per his own ethical compass. If Pharmacare has to be ethical it would need to do more for the indigenous people. Even if Pharmacare claims that it has provided the local people with employment, it is exploiting them and using them for cheap labor.
The actions of Pharmacare judged by various ethical perspectives: They are against the human rights of the Colberians. Still, the company is using them as cheap labor making them do hard and inhuman work.
This trustful relationship should continue. They live in natural settings and get the water they drink from natural tanks and rivers. So based upon the utilitarian perspective the actions of Pharmacare are unethical.
There is always a mutually beneficial relationship between businesses and society. Ethics and pharmacare good company would act responsibly and bear the responsibility of its people. Mostly, they have lived far from developed life and depended on natural resources for their living.
Ethics of care espouses values like care and affection for the weak and the dependent. They carry pounds of weight for miles. Exploiting the people is not like being dutiful.
However, the problem was that while these Super funds became an attractive source of revenue for the Federal government, a small part was spent on the real task. However, Pharmacare is not doing so.
Such actions reduce the trust between the businesses and the customers. They have never seen power or running tap water. It should mind its social image also and provide the indigenous people of Colberia with better working and living conditions.
Its actions are neither virtuous and nor ethical. However, it has not taken any step in this direction. The hard work they do is nothing less than physical torture.
Moreover, it is not responsible to tax the businesses that have not created those orphan sites for their clean up.
A Comparison with Enron: In the current case, the indigenous tribes are poor vulnerable people who depend on Pharmacare for a source of living.
Such sites become the responsibility of the government. A stakeholder is associated with a project. In fact apart from the primary and secondary stakeholders in their case, the entire society was affected. Pharmacare would not have to incur any major expenditure if it cared for the local people of Colberia.
The indigenous people carry fifty pounds for miles and are compensated meagerly in return. Indigenous tribes have always faced exploitation at the hands of finance hungry corporations and governments. So, again the company is being unethical. These people do not expect much from life.
They carry fifty pounds for 50 miles for as little as a dollar a day. They are aimed at satisfying its own needs. If Pharmacare were doing its duty, it would at least compensate them fairly.
Just a dollar a day is too meager and mean. Pharmacare and Superfunds taxes:assisting the Social & Ethics Committee to monitor implementation and compliance with the Group’s policies which guide expected ethical behaviour.
Aspen’s induction programme educates new employees on the ethics, values and the business philosophy of the Group. Ethics and Corporate Responsibility in the Workplace and the World Leslie Wilkins Legal Professor Ewenike August, 13, Abstract This paper will examine the ethics of a pharmaceutical company by the name of PharmaCARE.
Ethics of care Ethics of care, on the other hand, aims at ensuring that both parties involved benefit from a given action. Ethics of care would consider PharmaCARE’s use of Colberian intellectual property as unethical because the Colberians do not benefit from the exchange of information%(1).
Code of Ethics for Pharmacists PREAMBLE Pharmacists are health professionals who assist individuals in making the best use of medications. This Code, prepared and supported by pharmacists, is intended to state publicly the principles that form the fundamental basis of the roles and responsibilities of pharmacists.
These principles, based on moral obligations and virtues, are established to.
In Deontological ethics I believe that PharmaCARE was not acting ethical at all from LEG at Strayer University, Washington%(8). The idea of national drug coverage, or pharmacare, has been getting a lot of attention across Canada lately. More and more people are calling for a national pharmacare strategy, including doctors, nurses, economists, as well as people in contract and service jobs who don’t have drug coverage.Download